The central unit runs at MHz and the memory clock operates at up to MHz. The cooler can dissipate heat effectively from the GPU while keeping the fan at lower speed and noise.. Nevertheless, at the default frequencies the results could go either way, depending greatly on the gaming platform used for testing. On paper the Radeon appears to have the edge since the GT features just 8 pixel pipelines, 1 texture mapping unit and 4 vertex processing units. Global Game Awards
|Date Added:||25 September 2014|
|File Size:||49.68 Mb|
|Operating Systems:||Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
That said, most retail cards gibabyte not reflect the true performance of the GPU as they are usually either below or above the default specification. Can I Run It.
The central unit runs at MHz and the memory clock operates at up to MHz. However, this may not necessarily pose a problem for the GT, as we will also set our focus on overclocking tigabyte. The cards tested today will be pushed to the limits using the standard stock coolers. The GT was released over three years more recently than the X Proand so the GT is likely to have far better driver support, meaning it will be much more optimized and ultimately superior to the X Pro when running the radfon games.
The GT having better shader performance and an altogether better performance when taking into account other relevant data means that the GT delivers a significantly smoother and more efficient experience when processing graphical data than the X Pro.
Nevertheless, at the default frequencies the results could go either way, vigabyte greatly on the gaming platform used for testing.
NVIDIA GeForce GT vs. ATI Radeon X Pro > Benchmarks: 3Dmark, X3: Reunion – TechSpot
However, there is another product that will also tempt the budget user and this one comes from the green team. However, the actual shader performance of the X Pro is 4 and the actual shader performance of the GT is Making a brief comparison between both models we noticed both feature 12 pixel pipelines, 1 texture mapping unit and 5 vertex processing units, with the only difference between them being the core and memory clock frequencies.
Global Tadeon Awards TechSpot Account Sign up for freeit takes 30 seconds. There will also be a Radeon X Pro thrown into the comparison, which will under-go some extensive overclocking as well.
Price History for Gigabyte Radeon X1600 Pro Passive II 256MB
Join thousands of tech enthusiasts and participate. Already have an account?
The cooler can dissipate heat effectively from the GPU while keeping the fan at lower speed and noise. This is supported by the fact that the GT also has superior memory performance overall.
AMD Radeon X Pro MB compare Nvidia GeForce GT Gigabyte Turbo Cache 1GB Edition GPU
On paper the Radeon appears to have the edge since the GT x16000 just 8 pixel pipelines, 1 texture mapping unit and 4 vertex processing units.
Future Proof My PC. It’s significantly faster than its predecessors and so some of today’s games might be playable at medium settings although the low preset will have to be used on most.
The GT has MB more video memory than the X Proso is likely to be much better at displaying game textures at higher resolutions. Add your comment to this article You need to be a member to leave a comment. Intel Celeron G 2. Cooling Solution The Cooling System was replaced by Gigabyte’s custom-designed 80 mm cooler, with air flow optimized cover and aluminum base.
The difference is not significant enough for the GT to have a noticeably larger impact on your yearly electricity bills than the X Pro.
The GT has Sign up for freeit takes 30 seconds.